Writer’s Chatroom Interviews Shelley Armitage, Author of Walking the Llano

(This is an edited and
partial transcript from a live chat from The Writer’s Chatroom with Shelley Armitage on Jan 22, 2017 about her memoir Walking the Llano.)
Moderator Lisa Haselton: Welcome to The Writer’s Chatroom. Our mission is to
present fun and educational chats for readers and writers. 
Let me introduce our guest,
Shelley Armitage.
Shelley grew up in the
northwest Texas Panhandle in the small ranching and farming community of Vega,
Texas, in Oldham County.
She still owns and operates
a family farm, 1,200 acres of native grass, wheat and milo farmland bordering
Highway Interstate 40 on the south and the Canadian River breaks on the north.
Shelley shared this landscape from childhood on, riding with her father and
grandfather to check crops and cattle and later jogging and today walking the
farm roads.
Shelley’s professional life
has offered her a connection with landscape through studies of photography,
environmental literature, cultural and place studies. After living and working
in diverse places—Portugal, Poland, Finland, and Hungary, teaching in the
Southwest and Hawai’i, researching in New York, Washington DC, Oregon,
Illinois, Missouri, Connecticut—place has taken on special meanings.
The author of eight books
and fifty articles and essays, Shelley has held Fulbright Chairs in Warsaw and
Budapest, a Distinguished Senior Professorship in Cincinnati, and the Dorrance
Roderick Professorship in El Paso as well as three National Endowment for the
Humanities grants, a National Endowment for the Arts grant, and a Rockefeller
grant.
Shelley resides part of each
year in Las Cruces, New Mexico.
Ladies
and Gentlemen, please welcome Shelley!
Shelley Armitage: Thank you everyone. So great to be here.
Chatter Tricia: Could you talk about how prominently you think a sense of place should
figure in fiction?
SA: I think
it depends on the fiction. But I think place can be defined in many ways, even
Proust’s chair in a room. Often I think place is not a “setting,” or
a backdrop but something highly psychological, etc.
Chatter Tricia: Fascinating, Shelley. Thank you.
LH:
Shelley, what is the Llano Estacado and why was it important to you to walk
some of its many miles?
SA: The
Llano Estacado is a vast tableland (much of it at 4,000 feet) – an elevated
plateau – one of the largest in the U.S. My modest part is in the northwest
part of Texas near the New Mexico state line.
I found it important to walk
there in order to really sense the place, its prehistory, history, and the
various stories, including the land’s own narrative by actually feeling the
place. I say in the book that I felt I took the land up in my body and it came
out writing.
Also, that area is much
maligned, called by some still the Great American Desert, and stereotyped as
flat and “unworthy of love.” I found special beauty and surprising
revelations by spending many summers walking there.
LH: So you hadn’t planned to write about it when you walked it?
SA: No. At
first this was a kind of recreation and honestly a habit of many years spent
with my dad on the farmland. I had often jogged there and then later when I
wore out my knees, walking. So out of sheer boredom one summer, I decided to
start at the family farm and follow an intermittent creek some thirty miles to
where it empties into the Canadian River north.
My dad had known the
earliest settler, Ysabel Gurule, in that Canadian Valley north from the farm
and it turns out Ysabel’s dugout (he came in l876) was at the end of that
creek, connecting the farm to the river. I thought the two men’s lives and
narratives connected through the story I might discover from the land.
Chatter Michael: What are some of the major themes you’ve dealt with in your books and articles?
SA: Wow,
that’s a big one. I would say the theme of the forgotten, marginalized,
disregarded, etc. I’ve always chosen subjects that I considered very key, very
important but that may not be part of a given canon or centrist. For example,
the story of the llano.
Most people have never heard
of this geographic location much less the stories of Comanche and Kiowa, Clovis
and Folsom man, etc, etc. I’ve written about cartoonists who has been forgotten
yet who were key to defining the visual components of an era, for example.
In my recent book, there is
the theme of beauty redefined. Of a personal ecology, as I call it.
Chatter Tricia: Is that where you’ve planted native grasses?
SA: Yes,
the native grasses have been restored. There was already some native grass,
never plowed, there. It’s very satisfying to hope that habitat restoration
might make a difference.
Chatter Tricia: That’s wonderful, and it seems that habitat restoration would make a
difference for sure.
SA: It
helps restore wildlife corridors, for example, for pronghorn antelope. But the
book, Emerson like, takes the concrete, such as these ecological features we
are discussing, and I hope makes them soar.
Chatter Jim:
Interesting about the replanting. Do you have a notion of the depth of the top
soil there? I am trying to get an idea of the sort of grass there.
SA: Depth
of topsoil. Not sure really. But there is a healthy amount and dryland farming
does very well there. It’s actually easy to be ecologically smart there if one
is patient. There is buffalo, side oats grama, little bluestem, etc.
Chatter Jim:
I’ve heard of bluestem. My thanks.
SA: It’s
what folks call short grass prairie.
LH: Do you
remember a moment when you ‘knew’ you’d write the memoir? A day or when you
noticed something in particular?
SA:
Actually, I had been teaching a memoir course, without having written a memoir!
And yes, looking back on notes and photographs I took, I started thinking about
what Mary Austin said one time: “it’s the land that wants to be said.”
Someone else I had done scholarly work on, a poet, also said she wanted to be a
tongue for the wilderness.
Chatter Tricia: Beautiful.
LH: Ooh, I
like that phrase “a tongue for the wilderness”
Chatter Jim:
Me too. Really have a nice way with words, Shelley. 🙂
SA: I
thought that memoir as a form was particularly suited for what I thought about
the experiences: it may deal with interiority, but also with the explicit
world, thus concrete experience, but also interior thoughts, even dreams, the
spiritual, etc.
LH: Shelley,
what did you discover about yourself as you walked in relationship to the land
where you grew up?
SA: Oh, so
many things. The walks were also a respite from the worries I had carrying for
a declining mother and later dealing with her death (while this process was
going on) and also the death of my brother. I essentially lost all my family
while on these walks. I turned to the plains as a kind of family, believe it or
not, something that gave me strength and wisdom. I did a lot of research after
each walk and thus studied lifeways and beliefs of Native peoples, the care of
the land by pastores (New Mexico sheepherders), etc. The stories are what help
us along, as Leslie Silko has said, “we are nothing without the
stories.” Living these other stories, while making my own, was profound
for me.
In one passage, I say I want
to be adopted by mother earth and father sky, which sounds very corny out of
context, but as an adopted child, it resonated many ways.
LH: Have
you found poetry a way to express some of what you feel/experience?
SA: Yes,
absolutely. And the book we have been discussing has been reviewed over and
over as “lyric.” I think my interest in the poetic voice and
imagination, in writing poetry, in cultivating that ear, is in the book. Also,
this is a reason I like memoir: such freedom stylistically. My poetry also
deals with “a habit of landscape,” the idea that spending time in
places gives us keys to understanding ourselves and others.
Chatter Janet: Even your answers to our questions are lyrical, Shelley.
LH: I can hear your passion for the landscape and writing in your words
SA: Thank
you!!!
LH: What were some of your challenges in writing the memoir?
SA: Well,
for one, I had never written this kind of nonfiction. My scholarly works I hope
are very readable; I have always thought of myself as a writer (or someone who
attempts to be) rather than an academician. So grace and saying through style
have always been important. I had never written about myself until this memoir.
And it’s amazing how it went through so many stages. I wrote and rewrote it,
through a few years. I think each time I got closer to it writing itself, a
kind of flow that was natural. A real story. And I learned I could write in
segments. That I didn’t have to have a logical sequence. This was the most
freeing discovery–this and the realization that memoir allows for fictional
devices, so as I say I did not have to make everything logically sequential.
LH: Thank
you! Was it challenging to figure out what to include and what to leave out?
SA: Oh,
yes. Great question. At one point (and back to the question about the poetic) I
clipped and posted up on my garage wall the poetic lines I could not part with.
Yet, I didn’t know exactly what to do with them. Then, looking at them on the
wall (like Faulkner diagramming As I Lay
Dying
) I saw they were the subconscious underpinning of what I wanted to
say. So I could build on them. That way, I could cull what didn’t fit, didn’t
connect as extended metaphor or expanded imagistic theme.
LH: Sounds
like quite the process! 🙂
SA: I
found it kind of tricky when you already are a critic, a literary professor,
and come at literature from that perspective. To critique oneself, yet not gut
what is a primal sort of notion, the given line, the lyric voice, was
difficult. I found another self, the one I had always wanted as a writer, in
this book as in the poetry.
Chatter Jim:
I was wondering about your overseas time and how that influenced your writing?
SA: Yes,
great question. I think the Fulbrights and other overseas teaching have been
the pinnacle of my life. I was able to get out of myself, try to fit in, learn
from other cultures. I first went to Ethiopia when I was young and a young
teacher. That changed my life forever. I would always encourage anyone to
travel and to witness. I loved it!!
Chatter Janet: A reviewer of your memoir said “She carefully mines the history,
character, and geology of the Llano Estacado and combines it with a compelling
personal narrative to create an account that flows with lyricism, authenticity,
and wisdom.” You have crafted a beautiful story I believe. What period in
your life is in the book?
SA: The
book, or I should say the experience of the walks, began in my fifties. That
was a very transitional time for me; as I say, my mother had all sorts of
health problems and I found myself the prime caregiver even though I lived 400
miles away. I think that experience (the combination of adventure and loss)
really helped me grow.
Chatter Tricia: You mentioned your mother’s and brother’s deaths. Do you talk about
your grieving in the memoir?
SA:
Absolutely. I couple those experiences with the hikes, the walking. I don’t
know how to explain those chapters, but everything is interwoven, which becomes
the heart of the book. I still grieve frankly when I reread passages of the
book and am buoyed as well. The walks helped me cope and gave me strength.
LH:
Shelley – you mentioned you were teaching a memoir class before you wrote a
memoir — did your approach to the class change after you wrote the memoir?
SA:
Actually, I had taught the class previously, but then had a chance to
participate in that class later as a guest (I had developed the course). At
that time, I realized I hopefully understood much more about memoir!!! I think
the one thing that most affected me was realizing how narrative is not
sequential. I actually wrote almost flash pieces, sections, even some which
were aided by prompts (or forced by prompts!!). But somehow there was a thread,
a kind of subconscious reality, that, when I looked at the fragments, they
could be worked together.
LH: Thank you for sharing that.
SA: I
should give an example. There is the obvious element of water, of the lack of
it, in the llano. The Ogallala Aquifer, one of the largest in the world, runs
underneath, but is rapidly being depleted. So in terms of water I had a natural
trope emerging. My mother actually died from water on the brain. At one point,
thinking about her condition, I say “water will have its way.” This
has been set up in earlier chapters with my observations of the landscape where
water has previously sculpted the geography. And there is also an earlier
section about my father building a dam which didn’t hold against the periodic
rains. Water will have its way.
LH:
Shelley — what length do you enjoy writing the most? Do you find a particular
word count to feel ‘natural’?
SA: You
know, recently I have done these blogs, maybe a page and a half, which are
remarkably satisfying! But that scares me: can I write something longer anymore
or am I being lazy. But with short pieces, I think you have the challenge of
saying something interesting in a small space, really not having the luxury of
expanding, yet creating memorable kernels. I usually write about twenty pages
for a chapter. And am comfortable with that length.
LH: What tips would you have for someone wanting to write a memoir?
SA: Value
your own story (stories). Examine your life and think about the seemingly small
and insignificant things about it which are waiting for you to revisit. With memoir,
we have a double memory, that of the first experience, trying to remember it,
and that of recreating that experience. It’s almost like revising oneself,
perhaps we become a better self once written out. And I would say write, write,
write then look at that writing as if it is someone else’s. What have you
learned from it? What is missing? What do you want to know? And, back to my two
suggestions, what can be found there? What is remarkable about the seemingly
pedestrian elements of our lives?
And I forgot to say earlier
that a major theme in the book is that we ARE the landscape. As Leslie Silko
has said (sorry, but she is so right on in her comments), we are as much a part
of the landscape as the boulders we stand on. In other words, landscape is not
something “out there.” But, maybe we could say, in here.
LH: With
your connection to your landscape and obvious passion for words, are there any
writers, or poets, that come to mind for someone who wants to read beautiful
and/or lyrical descriptions?
SA: The
poetry of Peggy Church, a New Mexico writer, has inspired me. She’s an older
poet, that is, her style is totally lyric so may not be to the taste of some. I
would read The Way to Rainy Mountain by Scott Momaday as a classic memoir that’s
really an extended poem. Just freaking beautiful. Leslie Silko, a novelist. She
is a key to understanding form itself. Oh gosh, I have tons, but hard to call
them all up. Maybe I could send a list later!!!
I think of the novelist
Cristina Garcia who is a study in integrating very poetic lines with fictional
narrative.
Chatter Tricia: One that comes to my mind is “Lorna Doone.” I know it’s
‘old’, but it has some beautiful descriptions and places. It’s as though the
landscape is a major character in the story. I think that’s true in much 18th-
and 19th-century English literature, but perhaps in few books as much as this
one.
SA: Yes,
so much of British literature of a certain generation is full of lyrical work. I
tend to read so-called multi-cultural writers and contemporary work nowadays.
LH: Do you write longhand, or on a computer?
SA: I make
notes in longhand, but have written either on a typewriter or a computer since
junior high school, thank goodness. My dad brought home one of those little
pink numbers from his work place and I was smitten. And believe me, junior high
was a few years back!!!
I remember when John Updike
confessed he had to move from longhand in his writing practices to the
computer. I think that must have been tough.
LH: Thank
you, Shelley. We’re just about at the top of the hour, I can’t believe how fast
these 2 hours have gone. So I’ll ask you for final comments… anything else
you’d like to add before we close for today?
SA: I want
to thank everyone. How wonderful the questions and what a great experience. I
am thrilled to have been here.
Chatter Tricia: Is there a way to contact you on your website?
SA: Yes,
but also you can write me at ssarmitage@aol.com. Please do. Also, I would like
to mention I do a weekly blog at shelleyarmitage.com.
LH:
Shelley has been an entertaining and informative guest with much to share with
us. Check out her website after chat: http://shelleyarmitage.com/. Our Chatroom
Team and I want to thank Shelley for an interesting and entertaining chat.
Thank you!
SA:
Thanks! Super experience!!!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *